Hayden v. Hayden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hayden v. Hayden

44 A.D.2d 583, 353 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5458

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 18, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 44 A.D.2d 583 (Hayden v. Hayden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hayden v. Hayden, 44 A.D.2d 583, 353 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5458 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to section 651 of the Family Court Act for custody of the infant issue of a marriage, petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated November 29, 1973, which awarded custody of the infant to the respondent mother. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by adding thereto a provision giving the petitioner father visitation rights as to the infant for three weekends each month. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. Settle order on five days’ notice. In our opinion, while custody was properly awarded to respondent, appellant is entitled to visitation rights to the extent indicated herein. Gulotta, P. J., Martuseello, Shapiro, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to section 651 of the Family Court Act for custody of the infant issue of a marriage, petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated November 29, 1973, which awarded custody of the infant to the respondent mother. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by adding thereto a provision giving the petitioner father visitation rights as to the infant for three weekends each month. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. Settle order on five days’ notice. In our opinion, while custody was properly awarded to respondent, appellant is entitled to visitation rights to the extent indicated herein. Gulotta, P. J., Martuseello, Shapiro, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D.2d 583, 353 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayden-v-hayden-nyappdiv-1974.