Home/Supreme Court/Hayden v. D'Amico

Hayden v. D'Amico

178 L. Ed. 2d 474, 131 S. Ct. 685, 562 U.S. 1059, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9185, 79 U.S.L.W. 3326
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hayden v. D'Amico. Read the opinion of the Court — 179 L. Ed. 2d 312 →
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 29, 2010·No. No. 10-6652·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma paup-[475]*475eris denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 20, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayden v. D'Amico, 178 L. Ed. 2d 474, 131 S. Ct. 685, 562 U.S. 1059, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9185, 79 U.S.L.W. 3326 (U.S. 2010).

178 L. Ed. 2d 474 (Hayden v. D'Amico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.