Hayden v. Commissioner
This text of 127 F. App'x 975 (Hayden v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[976]*976MEMORANDUM
Stephen Hayden appeals a tax court decision upholding the Commissioner’s determination of deficiencies in his 1997 and 1998 federal income tax in the amounts of $102,731 and $26,347, respectively.
Because the long-term disability insurance payments that Hayden received in 1997 and 1998 were calculated with reference to his pre-disability earnings rather than to the nature of his injury and his eligibility to receive benefits was contingent upon his absence from work, the payments constituted gross income under 26 U.S.C. § 105(a) and did not qualify for exception under 26 U.S.C. § 105(c). See Beisler v. Commissioner, 814 F.2d 1304, 1307-08 (9th Cir.1987) (en banc). The tax court correctly upheld the Commissioner’s deficiency determination.
AFFIRMED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 F. App'x 975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayden-v-commissioner-ca9-2005.