Hayden v. Cipolato

Supreme Court of Florida

Hayden v. Cipolato

275 So. 2d 238, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4663

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 28, 1973

DocketNo. 42884

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 275 So. 2d 238 (Hayden v. Cipolato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hayden v. Cipolato, 275 So. 2d 238, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4663 (Fla. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and dispensed with argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F. S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and dispensed with argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F. S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 So. 2d 238, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayden-v-cipolato-fla-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack