Hayden v. Cipolato

275 So. 2d 238, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4663
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 28, 1973·No. No. 42884·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and dispensed with argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F. S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayden v. Cipolato, 275 So. 2d 238, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4663 (Fla. 1973).

275 So. 2d 238 (Hayden v. Cipolato) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. State
275 So. 2d 238 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)