Hayden Co. v. United States

4 Ct. Cust. 35, 1913 WL 19727, 1913 CCPA LEXIS 27
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedFebruary 18, 1913
DocketNo. 1005
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Ct. Cust. 35 (Hayden Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayden Co. v. United States, 4 Ct. Cust. 35, 1913 WL 19727, 1913 CCPA LEXIS 27 (ccpa 1913).

Opinion

Montgomery, Presiding Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

Large importations of marble products were made, claimed to be the professional productions of a sculptor only. The Board of General Appraisers found that the evidence produced was insufficient to establish the facts claimed. The importer appeals. The sole question presented is whether the finding of the board was justified.

A careful consideration of the record convinces us that the evidence was wholly insufficient to sustain the claim made by the importer.

The decision is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Ct. Cust. 35, 1913 WL 19727, 1913 CCPA LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayden-co-v-united-states-ccpa-1913.