Hayden & Co. v. Goeppinger

41 N.W. 607, 78 Iowa 753, 1889 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 300
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided February 6, 1889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Heed, C. J.

This cause was submitted in this court on an abstract which shows that a notice of appeal was served by defendants. L. and H. Goeppinger, on plaintiffs and the other defendants, but does not show the service of the notice on the clerk of the district court. Service of the notice on the clerk is essential to the appeal. Code, sec. 3178; McManus v. Swift, 76 Iowa, 576. The cause must therefore be

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayden & Co. v. Goeppinger, 41 N.W. 607, 78 Iowa 753, 1889 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 300 (iowa 1889).

41 N.W. 607 (Hayden & Co. v. Goeppinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Farrell v. Clossner
51 N.W. 16 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1892)