Hayden & Co. v. Goeppinger

Supreme Court of Iowa

Hayden & Co. v. Goeppinger

41 N.W. 607, 78 Iowa 753, 1889 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 300

CourtSupreme Court of Iowa

DecidedFebruary 6, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 N.W. 607 (Hayden & Co. v. Goeppinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hayden & Co. v. Goeppinger, 41 N.W. 607, 78 Iowa 753, 1889 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 300 (iowa 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Heed, C. J.

This cause was submitted in this court on an abstract which shows that a notice of appeal was served by defendants. L. and H. Goeppinger, on plaintiffs and the other defendants, but does not show the service of the notice on the clerk of the district court. Service of the notice on the clerk is essential to the appeal. Code, sec. 3178; McManus v. Swift, 76 Iowa, 576. The cause must therefore be

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heed, C. J.

This cause was submitted in this court on an abstract which shows that a notice of appeal was served by defendants. L. and H. Goeppinger, on plaintiffs and the other defendants, but does not show the service of the notice on the clerk of the district court. Service of the notice on the clerk is essential to the appeal. Code, sec. 3178; McManus v. Swift, 76 Iowa, 576. The cause must therefore be

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 N.W. 607, 78 Iowa 753, 1889 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayden-co-v-goeppinger-iowa-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack