Hayborn v. State
264 So. 2d 112, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6524
Opinion
We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis there, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed. See Cotton v. State, Third District Court of Appeal, 261 So.2d 179, opinion filed April 25, 1972; see also Killingsworth v. State, 1925, 90 Fla. 299, 105 So. 834; Sanders v. State, Fla.App.1971, 241 So.2d 430, and York v. State, Fla.App.1969, 232 So.2d 767.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hayborn v. State, 264 So. 2d 112, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6524 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
264 So. 2d 112 (Hayborn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lefler v. Lefler
264 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)