Hay v. Spillar's Executors

Superior Court of North Carolina

Hay v. Spillar's Executors

3 N.C. 155

Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1801·Published

Opinion

Iluf Judge..

The. question proposed is proper; a reversion, like this may lie passed by parol without deed.

Thu question was asked and the jury found for the plaintiffs. •A question was made upon the effect of the first deed, whether it conveyed the absolute property or only for life; hut the Judge gave no opinion upon-that point: he directed the raw to coneA der whether the parol evidence satisfied them that Spillar meant by consenting to Tutoi-s deed to pass his Interest, if any he hado

S¡>nere de hoc,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Iluf Judge..

The. question proposed is proper; a reversion, like this may lie passed by parol without deed.

Thu question was asked and the jury found for the plaintiffs. •A question was made upon the effect of the first deed, whether it conveyed the absolute property or only for life; hut the Judge gave no opinion upon-that point: he directed the raw to coneA der whether the parol evidence satisfied them that Spillar meant by consenting to Tutoi-s deed to pass his Interest, if any he hado

S¡>nere de hoc,.

Hay v. Spillar's Executors, 3 N.C. 155 (N.C. Ct. App. 1801).

Pincite

3 N.C. 155 (Hay v. Spillar's Executors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.