Hay v. Randles

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Hay v. Randles

140 N.W. 333, 152 Wis. 632, 1913 Wisc. LEXIS 122

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 11, 1913

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 N.W. 333 (Hay v. Randles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hay v. Randles, 140 N.W. 333, 152 Wis. 632, 1913 Wisc. LEXIS 122 (Wis. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Maeshall, J.

There are no questions of law for consideration on this appeal. Tbe sole question is as to whether any finding of fact, vital to tbe recovery, is contrary to tbe clear preponderance of tbe evidence. On such a matter, in general, there is little or no use of doing more than to state [633]*633the court’s conclusion which is, here, in the negative. No valuable purpose would be served, in this very ordinary case, by discussing the evidence. Therefore, no such discussion will be indulged in.

By the Court. — The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maeshall, J.

There are no questions of law for consideration on this appeal. Tbe sole question is as to whether any finding of fact, vital to tbe recovery, is contrary to tbe clear preponderance of tbe evidence. On such a matter, in general, there is little or no use of doing more than to state [633]*633the court’s conclusion which is, here, in the negative. No valuable purpose would be served, in this very ordinary case, by discussing the evidence. Therefore, no such discussion will be indulged in.

By the Court. — The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 N.W. 333, 152 Wis. 632, 1913 Wisc. LEXIS 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hay-v-randles-wis-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack