Hay v. Nichols
This text of 132 N.E.2d 617 (Hay v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner appearing pro se seeks an alternative' writ, of mandate to compel Harry E. Nichols, as Judge of the 'Jefferson Circuit Court, to show cause,' if any, why petitioner’s petition for writ of error cor am nobis should not be reinstated and the cause heard upon its merits.
It now appears to the court that petitioner’s petition for writ of error coram nobis has been reinstated by the respondent, Harry E. Nichols, as Judge of the Jefferson Circuit Court, and an order has been entered in said cause directing the petitioner to file affidavits in support of its petition in that court.
The relief which petitioner seeks already having been granted, this appeal is dismissed.
Note. — Reported in 132 N. E. 2d 617.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 N.E.2d 617, 235 Ind. 701, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hay-v-nichols-ind-1956.