Hay v. Hay

Nevada Supreme Court

Hay v. Hay

556 P.2d 1264, 92 Nev. 663, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 714

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 13, 1976

DocketNo. 8375

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 556 P.2d 1264 (Hay v. Hay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hay v. Hay, 556 P.2d 1264, 92 Nev. 663, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 714 (Neb. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

We have before us a transcript of only part of the proceedings below. In such cases, we presume that the testimony, and the inferences to be drawn from it, support the trial court’s findings. Kockos v. Bank of Nevada, 90 Nev. 140, 520 P.2d 1359 (1974); Fenkell v. Fenkell, 86 Nev. 397, 469 P.2d 701 [664]*664(1970). In light of our authorities in this regard, and in light of such record as is before us, we cannot say as a matter of law that the trial court erred.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

We have before us a transcript of only part of the proceedings below. In such cases, we presume that the testimony, and the inferences to be drawn from it, support the trial court’s findings. Kockos v. Bank of Nevada, 90 Nev. 140, 520 P.2d 1359 (1974); Fenkell v. Fenkell, 86 Nev. 397, 469 P.2d 701 [664]*664(1970). In light of our authorities in this regard, and in light of such record as is before us, we cannot say as a matter of law that the trial court erred.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 P.2d 1264, 92 Nev. 663, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hay-v-hay-nev-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack