Hay v. Hay

Indiana Supreme Court

Hay v. Hay

33 N.E.3d 1038, 2015 Ind. LEXIS 395, 2015 WL 3894612

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 11, 2015

DocketNo. 11A01-1401-DR-22

StatusPublished

This text of 33 N.E.3d 1038 (Hay v. Hay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hay v. Hay, 33 N.E.3d 1038, 2015 Ind. LEXIS 395, 2015 WL 3894612 (Ind. 2015).

Pincite

Opinions

Published Order

This matter has come before the Indiana Supreme Court on a petition to transfer jurisdiction, filed pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rules 56(B) and 57, following the issuance of a decision by the Court of Appeals in Hay v. Hay, No. 11A01-1401-DR-22, 2014 WL 4473646 (Ind.Ct.App. Sept. 11, 2014) (mem. dec.). The Court has reviewed the decision of the Court of Appeals, and the submitted record on appeal, all briefs filed in the Court of Appeals, and all materials filed in connection with the request to transfer jurisdiction have been made available to the Court for review. Each participating member has had the opportunity to voice that Justice’s views on the case in conference with the other Justices, and each participating member of the Court has voted on the petition.

Being duly advised, the Court DENIES the petition to transfer jurisdiction, and the Clerk is directed to certify the Court of Appeals decision as final.

RUSH, C.J., and RUCKER and MASSA, JJ., concur. DAVID, J., dissents to the denial of transfer with separate opinion, in which DICKSON, J., joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Published Order

This matter has come before the Indiana Supreme Court on a petition to transfer jurisdiction, filed pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rules 56(B) and 57, following the issuance of a decision by the Court of Appeals in Hay v. Hay, No. 11A01-1401-DR-22, 2014 WL 4473646 (Ind.Ct.App. Sept. 11, 2014) (mem. dec.). The Court has reviewed the decision of the Court of Appeals, and the submitted record on appeal, all briefs filed in the Court of Appeals, and all materials filed in connection with the request to transfer jurisdiction have been made available to the Court for review. Each participating member has had the opportunity to voice that Justice’s views on the case in conference with the other Justices, and each participating member of the Court has voted on the petition.

Being duly advised, the Court DENIES the petition to transfer jurisdiction, and the Clerk is directed to certify the Court of Appeals decision as final.

RUSH, C.J., and RUCKER and MASSA, JJ., concur. DAVID, J., dissents to the denial of transfer with separate opinion, in which DICKSON, J., joins.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 N.E.3d 1038, 2015 Ind. LEXIS 395, 2015 WL 3894612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hay-v-hay-ind-2015.