Hay v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

286 S.W.3d 725, 374 Ark. 216, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 469
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided September 11, 2008·No. 08-990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Leah Lanford, the court-appointed attorney ad litem for juveniles S.S., M.H., and B.M., and Keith L. Chrestman, a qualified part-time attorney ad litem, filed a joint motion for substitution of appellate counsel to allow Lanford to withdraw as counsel and to appoint Chrestman as the attorney ad litem on appeal. Pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-10 (2008), “[a]fter the notice of the appeal has been filed with the Circuit Clerk, the appellate court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to relieve counsel and appoint new counsel.” Thus, we grant the motion to substitute Chrestman as the attorney ad litem in this case.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hay v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 286 S.W.3d 725, 374 Ark. 216, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 469 (Ark. 2008).

286 S.W.3d 725 (Hay v. Arkansas Department of Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Archer
286 S.W.3d 725 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2008)