Hay v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
This text of 286 S.W.3d 725 (Hay v. Arkansas Department of Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Leah Lanford, the court-appointed attorney ad litem for juveniles S.S., M.H., and B.M., and Keith L. Chrestman, a qualified part-time attorney ad litem, filed a joint motion for substitution of appellate counsel to allow Lanford to withdraw as counsel and to appoint Chrestman as the attorney ad litem on appeal. Pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-10 (2008), “[a]fter the notice of the appeal has been filed with the Circuit Clerk, the appellate court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to relieve counsel and appoint new counsel.” Thus, we grant the motion to substitute Chrestman as the attorney ad litem in this case.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 S.W.3d 725, 374 Ark. 216, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hay-v-arkansas-department-of-human-services-ark-2008.