Hay v. American Union Fire Insurance

83 S.E. 1092, 168 N.C. 88, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 10
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 21, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 83 S.E. 1092 (Hay v. American Union Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hay v. American Union Fire Insurance, 83 S.E. 1092, 168 N.C. 88, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 10 (N.C. 1914).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It appearing to the Court that the second and third findings of fact made by the referee are not sufficiently explicit to enable the Court to determine whether the sum of $1,503.40 is derived from the *89 cancellations and reinsurances placed by the plaintiffs with companies in their office, within the meaning of the language used in the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, and there being a dispute as to whether there is any evidence to'support the finding that the plaintiffs have returned the amount to the American Union Fire Insurance Company, it is ordered that the case be remanded, to the end that additional evidence may be heard, if so desired, and additional findings of fact be made.

Eemanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 S.E. 1092, 168 N.C. 88, 1914 N.C. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hay-v-american-union-fire-insurance-nc-1914.