Hay Associates v. Commonwealth

Richmond County Circuit Court

Hay Associates v. Commonwealth

21 Va. Cir. 534, 1984 Va. Cir. LEXIS 157

CourtRichmond County Circuit Court

DecidedFebruary 6, 1984

DocketCase No. LG-649

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Va. Cir. 534 (Hay Associates v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Richmond County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hay Associates v. Commonwealth, 21 Va. Cir. 534, 1984 Va. Cir. LEXIS 157 (Va. Super. Ct. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

By JUDGE WILLARD I. WALKER

If, as a matter of law, the plaintiff may not bring an action against the Commonwealth without its consent on a quantum meruit theory, then, of necessity, the Commonwealth’s immunity defense as to that claim must be valid. There is no reason to go back and rework the same ground with different motions under different names. The court does, in fact, strike Count II of the motion for judgment and dismiss that count with prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By JUDGE WILLARD I. WALKER

If, as a matter of law, the plaintiff may not bring an action against the Commonwealth without its consent on a quantum meruit theory, then, of necessity, the Commonwealth’s immunity defense as to that claim must be valid. There is no reason to go back and rework the same ground with different motions under different names. The court does, in fact, strike Count II of the motion for judgment and dismiss that count with prejudice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Va. Cir. 534, 1984 Va. Cir. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hay-associates-v-commonwealth-vaccrichmondcty-1984.