Hawthorne v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hawthorne v. State

217 So. 2d 820, 44 Ala. App. 608, 1969 Ala. App. LEXIS 364

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 7, 1969

Docket1 Div. 291

StatusPublished

This text of 217 So. 2d 820 (Hawthorne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawthorne v. State, 217 So. 2d 820, 44 Ala. App. 608, 1969 Ala. App. LEXIS 364 (Ala. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of robbery. The jury set Hawthorne’s punishment at the statutory minimum, i. e., ten years in the penitentiary.

We have considered the entire record at every point required under Code 1940, T. 15, § 389, i. e., every ruling of the trial judge adverse to the defendant, the organization of the court (Supreme Court Rule 24), the indictment including the caption (Code 1940, T. 15, §§ 229 and 259, No. 95), its charge, conclusion and endorsements, the judgment entry with arraignment, plea, verdict, allocutus, sentence, and the written charges refused appellant.

From this examination we conclude that the judgment below is due to be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CATES, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of robbery. The jury set Hawthorne’s punishment at the statutory minimum, i. e., ten years in the penitentiary.

We have considered the entire record at every point required under Code 1940, T. 15, § 389, i. e., every ruling of the trial judge adverse to the defendant, the organization of the court (Supreme Court Rule 24), the indictment including the caption (Code 1940, T. 15, §§ 229 and 259, No. 95), its charge, conclusion and endorsements, the judgment entry with arraignment, plea, verdict, allocutus, sentence, and the written charges refused appellant.

From this examination we conclude that the judgment below is due to be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 So. 2d 820, 44 Ala. App. 608, 1969 Ala. App. LEXIS 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawthorne-v-state-alactapp-1969.