Hawthorne v. McGuire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hawthorne v. McGuire

78 A.D.2d 871, 434 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13587

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.D.2d 871 (Hawthorne v. McGuire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawthorne v. McGuire, 78 A.D.2d 871, 434 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 26, 1979, which granted respondents’ motion to change the venue of the proceeding from Kings County to New York County. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an intermediate order in a proceeding against a body or officer [872]*872pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the absence of permission (see CPLR 5701, subd [b], par 1). If we were not dismissing, we would affirm. The transfer was neither contrary to law nor an abuse of discretion (cf. Sassower v Finnerty, 68 AD2d 936). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 26, 1979, which granted respondents’ motion to change the venue of the proceeding from Kings County to New York County. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an intermediate order in a proceeding against a body or officer [872]*872pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the absence of permission (see CPLR 5701, subd [b], par 1). If we were not dismissing, we would affirm. The transfer was neither contrary to law nor an abuse of discretion (cf. Sassower v Finnerty, 68 AD2d 936). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 871, 434 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawthorne-v-mcguire-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack