Hawthorne v. Hutton
28 A.D.2d 969, 283 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3399
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 21, 1967·Published
Opinion
Memorandum : “ In filiation proceedings, the proof must be ‘ entirely satisfactory" to sustain an order” [directing support], (People v. Borner, 280 App. Div. 141.) The proof in this case does not meet that standard, and consequently the order was unsupported by the testimony adduced. (Appeal from order of Erie Family Court determining paternity and ordering support.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Del Veeehio and Marsh, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hawthorne v. Hutton, 28 A.D.2d 969, 283 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3399 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).
28 A.D.2d 969 (Hawthorne v. Hutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Borner
280 A.D. 141 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)