Hawthorne v. Hutton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hawthorne v. Hutton

28 A.D.2d 969, 283 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3399

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 21, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 28 A.D.2d 969 (Hawthorne v. Hutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawthorne v. Hutton, 28 A.D.2d 969, 283 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3399 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum : “ In filiation proceedings, the proof must be ‘ entirely satisfactory" to sustain an order” [directing support], (People v. Borner, 280 App. Div. 141.) The proof in this case does not meet that standard, and consequently the order was unsupported by the testimony adduced. (Appeal from order of Erie Family Court determining paternity and ordering support.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Del Veeehio and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum : “ In filiation proceedings, the proof must be ‘ entirely satisfactory" to sustain an order” [directing support], (People v. Borner, 280 App. Div. 141.) The proof in this case does not meet that standard, and consequently the order was unsupported by the testimony adduced. (Appeal from order of Erie Family Court determining paternity and ordering support.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Del Veeehio and Marsh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A.D.2d 969, 283 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawthorne-v-hutton-nyappdiv-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack