Hawthorne, of the Brig Clarissa Claiborne v. The United States

Supreme Court

Hawthorne, of the Brig Clarissa Claiborne v. The United States

11 U.S. 107, 3 L. Ed. 284, 7 Cranch 107, 1812 U.S. LEXIS 372

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 1, 1812·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Marshall, Ch, J.

What prevents you from producing the witnesses here, or taking their depositions de novo,

Hare, Suggested a doubt, whether cases fot1 violation of the Embargo, are cases of admiralty, or of prize jurisdiction,

However, on a subsequent day he moved •for', and bbtained a commission to take the depositions of witnesses at New Orleans, to be*used on the trial in this Court, at ..the next term.

A like commission was granted in the case of Williams and Jlrmroyd, at this term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall, Ch, J.

What prevents you from producing the witnesses here, or taking their depositions de novo,

Hare, Suggested a doubt, whether cases fot1 violation of the Embargo, are cases of admiralty, or of prize jurisdiction,

However, on a subsequent day he moved •for', and bbtained a commission to take the depositions of witnesses at New Orleans, to be*used on the trial in this Court, at ..the next term.

A like commission was granted in the case of Williams and Jlrmroyd, at this term.

Hawthorne, of the Brig Clarissa Claiborne v. The United States, 11 U.S. 107, 3 L. Ed. 284, 7 Cranch 107, 1812 U.S. LEXIS 372 (1812).

Pincite

11 U.S. 107 (Hawthorne, of the Brig Clarissa Claiborne v. The United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related