Hawthorne Industries, Inc. v. Poole

238 S.E.2d 719, 143 Ga. App. 366, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2321
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 19, 1977·No. 54497·Published

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

Is the cash surrender value of a life insurance policy, for the withdrawal of which no steps have been taken by the insured, subject to garnishment by a judgment creditor of the insured?

The question was answered in the negative by the trial court which dismissed the garnishment action. A like question had been answered in the negative by the Supreme Court in Farmers &c. Bank v. National Life Ins. [367]*367Co., 161 Ga. 793 (131 SE 902) (1926). "A creditor of the insured cannot garnish the insurer merely because the insured has an unexercised right to exercise an option to take the cash-surrender value of the policy.” 18 Couch on Insurance 2d 318, § 74: 114.

Argued September 8, 1977 Decided September 19, 1977 Rehearing denied September 30, 1977 Mitchell, Mitchell, Coppedge, Boyett, Wester & Bates, J. Raymond Bates, Jr., for appellant. Joe Tuggle, Philip R. Lazzara, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawthorne Industries, Inc. v. Poole, 238 S.E.2d 719, 143 Ga. App. 366, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2321 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

238 S.E.2d 719 (Hawthorne Industries, Inc. v. Poole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. National Life Insurance
131 S.E. 902 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)