Hawthorne Industries, Inc. v. Poole
This text of 238 S.E.2d 719 (Hawthorne Industries, Inc. v. Poole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Is the cash surrender value of a life insurance policy, for the withdrawal of which no steps have been taken by the insured, subject to garnishment by a judgment creditor of the insured?
The question was answered in the negative by the trial court which dismissed the garnishment action. A like question had been answered in the negative by the Supreme Court in Farmers &c. Bank v. National Life Ins. [367]*367Co., 161 Ga. 793 (131 SE 902) (1926). "A creditor of the insured cannot garnish the insurer merely because the insured has an unexercised right to exercise an option to take the cash-surrender value of the policy.” 18 Couch on Insurance 2d 318, § 74: 114.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 S.E.2d 719, 143 Ga. App. 366, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawthorne-industries-inc-v-poole-gactapp-1977.