Hawpe v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Hawpe v. Smith

25 Tex. 448

DecidedOctober 15, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Tex. 448 (Hawpe v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawpe v. Smith, 25 Tex. 448 (Tex. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, J.

—We arc of opinion that there is no error in the judgment. It does not satisfactorily appear that the defendant in error made any representations concerning the title to the eighty acres of land at the time of the sale by him as administrator. At all events, there is no evidence of any representations by the administrator, Smith, that would relieve the plaintiff in error from the operation of the rule of caveat emptor. It is only necessary to refer to the case of Walton et al. v. Reager, 20 Tex., 103.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, J.

—We arc of opinion that there is no error in the judgment. It does not satisfactorily appear that the defendant in error made any representations concerning the title to the eighty acres of land at the time of the sale by him as administrator. At all events, there is no evidence of any representations by the administrator, Smith, that would relieve the plaintiff in error from the operation of the rule of caveat emptor. It is only necessary to refer to the case of Walton et al. v. Reager, 20 Tex., 103.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Tex. 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawpe-v-smith-tex-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack