Haworth v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Haworth v. State

14 Ind. 260

DecidedJune 2, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Ind. 260 (Haworth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haworth v. State, 14 Ind. 260 (Ind. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a prosecution for retailing spirituous liquors, under the statute of 1853. Motion to quash the information overruled, and verdict and judgment' against the defendant.

IT. A. Brouse and R. Vaile, for the appellant. J. E. McDonald, Attorney General, and A. L. Roache, for the state.

For reasons given in the case of Meshmeier v. The State, 11 Ind. R. 482, the judgment is reversed.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was a prosecution for retailing spirituous liquors, under the statute of 1853. Motion to quash the information overruled, and verdict and judgment' against the defendant.

IT. A. Brouse and R. Vaile, for the appellant. J. E. McDonald, Attorney General, and A. L. Roache, for the state.

For reasons given in the case of Meshmeier v. The State, 11 Ind. R. 482, the judgment is reversed.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &C.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Ind. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haworth-v-state-ind-1860.