Haworth v. Nystrom
This text of 11 F. Cas. 885 (Haworth v. Nystrom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only case set out in the bill, as we understand it is that predicated on the defendant’s failure to perform his contract therein stated, and as both parties reside in Pennsylvania, this court has no jurisdiction of that.
The argument that the plaintiff may be regarded as standing on the copyright named as owner thereof, seeking relief against the defendant for infringement, is very ingenious, but cannot be accepted as sound. The demurrer must be sustained and the bill dismissed, without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 F. Cas. 885, 8 W.N.C. 204, 1879 U.S. App. LEXIS 1983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haworth-v-nystrom-circtedpa-1879.