Hawn v. Suorsa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hawn v. Suorsa

93 A.D.3d 1249, 939 N.Y.S.2d 923

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 93 A.D.3d 1249 (Hawn v. Suorsa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawn v. Suorsa, 93 A.D.3d 1249, 939 N.Y.S.2d 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decree (denominated decision and order) of the Surrogate’s Court, Ontario County (Frederick G. Reed, S.), entered April 4, 2011. The decree determined the right of election of Richard Sheldon to be valid.

It is hereby ordered that the decree so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision by the Surrogate. Present — Scudder, PJ., Centra, Garni, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decree (denominated decision and order) of the Surrogate’s Court, Ontario County (Frederick G. Reed, S.), entered April 4, 2011. The decree determined the right of election of Richard Sheldon to be valid.

It is hereby ordered that the decree so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision by the Surrogate. Present — Scudder, PJ., Centra, Garni, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A.D.3d 1249, 939 N.Y.S.2d 923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawn-v-suorsa-nyappdiv-2012.