Hawn v. Blunt

105 N.E. 785, 56 Ind. App. 546, 1914 Ind. App. LEXIS 62
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided June 26, 1914·No. No. 8,866·Published

Opinion

Lairy, J.

Appellant brought this action against appellee as auditor of Scott County for the purpose of enjoining him from taking further steps in a proceeding for the location of a highway. The complaint was in one paragraph and a demurrer thereto was sustained. Appellant refused to plead further and final judgment was rendered against him for costs. The sufficiency of the complaint is the only question before this court.

1. The complaint contains no averment that the plaintiff is the owner of any lands affected by the proposed highway, and plaintiff does not allege therein that he is either a citizen or a taxpayer of the township where such proposed highway is to be located. The complaint [547]*547wholly fails to show any right existing in favor of the plaintiff by reason of which he is entitled to maintain this action. Sparling v. Dwenger (1877), 60 Ind. 72.

The complaint is defective in other particulars, but no useful purpose would be subserved by pointing out such defects in this opinion. The complaint is wholly insufficient and the trial court did not err in sustaining a demurrer thereto. Judgment affirmed.

Note. — Reported In 105 N. E. 785.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawn v. Blunt, 105 N.E. 785, 56 Ind. App. 546, 1914 Ind. App. LEXIS 62 (Ind. Ct. App. 1914).

105 N.E. 785 (Hawn v. Blunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sparling v. Dwenger
60 Ind. 72 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1877)