HAWN, SANDRA v. SUORSA, LYNNE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 2012·No. CA 11-01601·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

376 CA 11-01601 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ANITA D. SHELDON, DECEASED. ------------------------------------------ SANDRA HAWN, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD SHELDON, DECEASED, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, ORDER V

LYNNE SUORSA AND CLYDE HOWSON, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

LELAND T. WILLIAMS, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

SCOTT AND GILBERT, LLP, CANANDAIGUA (JOHN J. GILBERT OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a decree (denominated decision and order) of the Surrogate’s Court, Ontario County (Frederick G. Reed, S.), entered April 4, 2011. The decree determined the right of election of Richard Sheldon to be valid.

It is hereby ORDERED that the decree so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision by the Surrogate.

Entered: March 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWN, SANDRA v. SUORSA, LYNNE, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

HAWN, SANDRA v. SUORSA, LYNNE (HAWN, SANDRA v. SUORSA, LYNNE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.