Hawley v. Village of Penn Yan
38 A.D.3d 1371, 834 N.Y.S.2d 885
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Motion insofar as it seeks reargument granted and, upon reargument, the memorandum and order entered December 22, 2006 (35 AD3d 1270 [2006]) is amended by deleting the phrase “with all but one of the telephone numbers redacted” from the second sentence of the first paragraph of the memorandum and substituting the phrase “with all but the unlisted telephone numbers redacted.” Fresent—Scudder, EJ, Hurlbutt, Gorski and Pine, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hawley v. Village of Penn Yan, 38 A.D.3d 1371, 834 N.Y.S.2d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).
38 A.D.3d 1371 (Hawley v. Village of Penn Yan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Irwin v. Onondaga County Resource Recovery Agency
72 A.D.3d 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)