Hawley v. Tarbe
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
In this case a sequestration was obtained at the instance of the plaintiff, on the affidavit of a person styling himself her agent. It is admitted, that at the time the affidavit was made the plaintiff was present in the city, and not prevented by sickness or other physical cause, from making the affidavit herself. The article two hundred and seventy-six of the [93]*93Code of Practice, pre-supposes that the affidavit in a case of sequestration is to be made by the plaintiff.
Where the plaintiff is present, and no proper cause is assigned for his not making the affidavit, the oath of his agent is, in our opinion, not sufficient to authorise the issuing of a writ of sequestration.
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the parish court be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
14 La. 92 (Hawley v. Tarbe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.