Hawley v. Tarbe

14 La. 92
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1839
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 La. 92 (Hawley v. Tarbe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawley v. Tarbe, 14 La. 92 (La. 1839).

Opinion

Eustis, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case a sequestration was obtained at the instance of the plaintiff, on the affidavit of a person styling himself her agent. It is admitted, that at the time the affidavit was made the plaintiff was present in the city, and not prevented by sickness or other physical cause, from making the affidavit herself. The article two hundred and seventy-six of the [93]*93Code of Practice, pre-supposes that the affidavit in a case of sequestration is to be made by the plaintiff.

The article 276 of the Code of Practice, •presupposes that the affidavit in a case of sequestration is to be made by the plaintiff; and when he is present, and no proper cause assigned to prevent him, the affidavit of the agent will not be sufficient.

Where the plaintiff is present, and no proper cause is assigned for his not making the affidavit, the oath of his agent is, in our opinion, not sufficient to authorise the issuing of a writ of sequestration.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the parish court be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Onorato v. Sanchez
14 Teiss. 319 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 La. 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawley-v-tarbe-la-1839.