Hawley v. State
891 So. 2d 1154, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 590, 2005 WL 156750
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hawley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 822 So. 2d 552 →
Opinion
Appellant was re-sentenced after successfully moving to correct his initial sentence, which exceeded the statutory maximum. We reverse ’ and remand the sentence imposed at re-sentencing, because appellant was not represented by counsel at re-sentencing and the record does not show his knowing waiver of the right to counsel. See State v. Scott, 439 So.2d 219 (Fla.1983); Behrman v. State, 696 So.2d 811 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1997); Chestnut v. State, 578 So.2d 27 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hawley v. State, 891 So. 2d 1154, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 590, 2005 WL 156750 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
891 So. 2d 1154 (Hawley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chestnut v. State
578 So. 2d 27 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State v. Scott
439 So. 2d 219 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Behrman v. State
696 So. 2d 811 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)