Hawley v. Hasgo Power Equipment Sales, Inc.

269 A.D.2d 804, 703 N.Y.S.2d 419, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1699
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 16, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 804 (Hawley v. Hasgo Power Equipment Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawley v. Hasgo Power Equipment Sales, Inc., 269 A.D.2d 804, 703 N.Y.S.2d 419, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject the contention of plaintiff that Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying that portion of his motion seeking to compel discovery and granting that part of defendant’s cross motion seeking a protective order. The trial court is vested with broad discretion in supervising pretrial discovery (see, Farrakhan v N.Y.P. Holdings, 226 AD2d 133, 135). Although CPLR 3101 (a) is to be interpreted liberally in favor of disclosure (see, Andon v 302-304 Mott St. Assocs., 257 AD2d 37, 40), a party may not be compelled to produce information that does not exist or that he or she does not control or possess, nor may a party be compelled to create new documents (see, Durham Med. Search v Physicians Intl. Search, 122 AD2d 529, 529-530). Here, the court was well within its discretion in fashioning an order that, balanced the interests of the parties and curtailed the unduly burdensome demands of plaintiff. We have examined plaintiffs remaining contentions and conclude that they lack merit. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, McCarthy, J. — Discovery.) Present — Green, A. P. J., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CSMC 2007-C1 OSWEGO ROAD, LLC v. KIMBROOK ROUTE 31, LLC
120 A.D.3d 1539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Optic Plus Enterprises, Ltd. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.
37 A.D.3d 1185 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Orzech v. Smith
12 A.D.3d 1150 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Baliva v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
275 A.D.2d 1030 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 804, 703 N.Y.S.2d 419, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawley-v-hasgo-power-equipment-sales-inc-nyappdiv-2000.