Hawley v. Bates
19 Wend. 632
Opinion
By the Court,
The writ of replevin was irregular without the bond required by the statute, 18 Wendell, 584; but as a new bond conforming thereto has been made and duly delivered, and as the error in the first bond arose from the mistake of the sheriff, we will allow the proceedings to stand good, on payment of the costs of this motion. This saves the defendant harmless, and secures him the benefit of the statute, without imposing upon the plaintiff the trouble and expense of a new suit.
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hawley v. Bates, 19 Wend. 632 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1839).
19 Wend. 632 (Hawley v. Bates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stone v. Church
172 Misc. 1007 (Broome County Court, 1939)
Arthur v. Schriever
28 Jones & S. 59 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1891)
Arthur v. Schriever
16 N.Y.S. 610 (Superior Court of New York, 1891)
Hanson v. Langan
9 N.Y.S. 625 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1890)
Sprague v. Devens
1 Mich. N.P. 236 (Circuit Court of the 15th Circuit of Michigan, 1870)
Smith v. Howard
23 Ark. 203 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1861)
Kissam v. Marshall
10 Abb. Pr. 424 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Decker v. . Judson
16 N.Y. 439 (New York Court of Appeals, 1857)
Depew v. Leal
2 Abb. Pr. 131 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1855)
Branch v. Littleberry Branch
6 Fla. 314 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1855)
Spalding v. Spalding
3 How. Pr. 297 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)
Cutler v. Rathbone
1 Hill & Den. 204 (New York Supreme Court, 1841)