Hawley, Stirling & Co. v. Stirling
This text of 2 Cal. 470 (Hawley, Stirling & Co. v. Stirling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by HeydeneeIiDT, Justice, with whom Murray, Chief Justice, concurred.
The error relied on in this case is the refusal of a continuance. The affidavit discloses no diligence on the part of the applicant; but independent of that question, the proof which was designed to be obtained by the delay, would constitute no defence against the present plaintiffs. •
The application was therefore properly refused; and the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Cal. 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawley-stirling-co-v-stirling-cal-1852.