Hawks v. State

475 So. 2d 1001, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2167, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15919
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 19, 1985
DocketNo. 84-1815
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 475 So. 2d 1001 (Hawks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawks v. State, 475 So. 2d 1001, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2167, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15919 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The valid reasons stated by the trial court for imposing a sentence under the Youthful Offender Act (eh. 958, Fla.Stat.) for offenses committed after July 1, 1984, were per se sufficient “to explain the guideline departure when an alternative program is used.” See Amendment to the Rules of Criminal Procedure, 451 So.2d 824 (Fla.1984).

AFFIRMED.

COBB, C.J., and ORFINGER and CO-WART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vega v. State
498 So. 2d 1294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
475 So. 2d 1001, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2167, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawks-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.