Hawks v. State
475 So. 2d 1001, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2167, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15919
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 19, 1985·No. No. 84-1815·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The valid reasons stated by the trial court for imposing a sentence under the Youthful Offender Act (eh. 958, Fla.Stat.) for offenses committed after July 1, 1984, were per se sufficient “to explain the guideline departure when an alternative program is used.” See Amendment to the Rules of Criminal Procedure, 451 So.2d 824 (Fla.1984).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hawks v. State, 475 So. 2d 1001, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2167, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15919 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
475 So. 2d 1001 (Hawks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vega v. State
498 So. 2d 1294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)