Hawks v. Deushles Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Hawks v. Deushles Construction Co.

192 So. 2d 4

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 9, 1966

DocketNo. 35563

StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 2d 4 (Hawks v. Deushles Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawks v. Deushles Construction Co., 192 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 20, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10,'subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and attorney's fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI