Hawks v. David

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 26, 2011
• Docket: 10-7724
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7724

ANTHONY D. HAWKS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

and

JANENERE HAWKS; DANA ANTHONY HAWKS,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LARRY DAVID; ALLEN ADKINS; DAVID PHIPPS; CHRISTOPHER TIMMS; PAUL ABELL; JOSEPHINE BROWN; ALONG, First Name Unknown; PARK, First Name Unknown; HUDSON, First Name Unknown; SELMAN, First Name Unknown; FITZGERALD, First Name Unknown; GEORGE, First Name Unknown; KREMER, First Name Unknown; NANCY B. SHUAR; JAMES SALKIN; DANIAL L. SUSSMAN; GARY A. TICKNOR; STATE OF MARYLAND; WILLIAM D. SCHAEFER; MARTIN O’MALLEY; CITY OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND; KURT SCHMOKE; STEPHANIE RAWLINGS-BLAKE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-02250-PJM)

Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 26, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony D. Hawks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Anthony D. Hawks appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to reconsider the order dismissing as time-

barred his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Hawks v. David,

No. 1:10-cv-02250-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 2, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED