Hawkins v. Stover

622 S.W.2d 667, 274 Ark. 125, 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1437
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 26, 1981
Docket81-113
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 622 S.W.2d 667 (Hawkins v. Stover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawkins v. Stover, 622 S.W.2d 667, 274 Ark. 125, 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1437 (Ark. 1981).

Opinion

Richard B. Adkisson, Chief Justice.

On March 3,1981, John Marlar, Ouachita County Judge, resigned from office. The quorum court, acting pursuant to Act 392 of 1981, appointed James Harvey Rumph interim county judge and called a special election to permanently fill the vacancy. This appeal is from a circuit court judgment declaring Act 392 unconstitutional and enjoining appellant from holding a special election. We affirm.

Amendment 55 of the Arkansas Constitution provides that “ ... the Quorum Court shall have the power to ... fill vacancies in elective county offices. ...” Act 392 of 1981 [Ark. Stat. Ann. § 17-3812 (Supp. 1981)] provides:

SECTION 1. All quorum courts are hereby authorized, in their discretion, to call special elections for the purpose of filling vacancies in the office of county judge.

Arkansas Constitution Amendment 29, generally, provides for the filling of vacancies in elective county offices. Amendment 55 changes this procedure only to the extent that the quorum court is substituted for the governor as the appointive authority. We held in McCraw v. Pate, 254 Ark. 357, 494 S.W. 2d 94 (1973) that under Amendment 29 the alternative of holding a special election to fill a vacancy is not available.

It is clear that Amendment 55, when read in conjunction with Amendment 29, is complete and self executing as to the manner of filling vacancies in county offices and, therefore, Act 392 of 1981 is constitutionally infirm. Judge Rumph was duly and regularly appointed in accordance with Amendment 55 and will serve until his successor is duly elected and qualified under Amendment 29. McCraw, supra.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports, 2003
Oliver v. Simons
885 S.W.2d 859 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 S.W.2d 667, 274 Ark. 125, 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-stover-ark-1981.