Hawkins v. State

1919 OK CR 74, 178 P. 893, 15 Okla. Crim. 686, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 62
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 3, 1919
DocketNo. A-3079.
StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 74 (Hawkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawkins v. State, 1919 OK CR 74, 178 P. 893, 15 Okla. Crim. 686, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 62 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error were convicted of keeping a place in the city of Enid with the felonious intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors, and their punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary and two hundred dollars fine each. To reverse the judgments rendered on the verdict, they appeal.

In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution was based was held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgments appealed from are reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 74, 178 P. 893, 15 Okla. Crim. 686, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.