Hawkins v. State

240 S.W.3d 201, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1683, 2007 WL 4302425
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 11, 2007·No. ED 89134·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, James Hawkins, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawkins v. State, 240 S.W.3d 201, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1683, 2007 WL 4302425 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

240 S.W.3d 201 (Hawkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dexter v. Mehlville Fire Protection District
240 S.W.3d 201 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)