Hawkins v. State
116 S.W.3d 660, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1270, 2003 WL 21910931
Opinion
ORDER
Nathan Hawkins appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the determination of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We affirm the judgment for the reasons set forth in the motion court’s comprehensive findings of fact and conclusions of law. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hawkins v. State, 116 S.W.3d 660, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1270, 2003 WL 21910931 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).
116 S.W.3d 660 (Hawkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McClelland v. Hogan Personnel, LLC
116 S.W.3d 660 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003)