Hawkins v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hawkins v. State

232 S.E.2d 377, 141 Ga. App. 31, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1744

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 13, 1977

Docket53284

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 232 S.E.2d 377 (Hawkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawkins v. State, 232 S.E.2d 377, 141 Ga. App. 31, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1744 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

*31 Webb, Judge.

Joseph Hawkins was convicted of possessing more than one ounce of marijuana (Code Ann. §§ 79A-811 (j), 79A-9917), and he now enumerates as error the general grounds of the motion for new trial and the sustaining of an objection to his testimony that he had never smoked a cigarette nor taken a drink of liquor. We affirm.

1. The evidence reveals that Hawkins rented and controlled the room where the marijuana was found, thus authorizing a finding of constructive possession. "In the absence of any circumstances to the contrary, a presumption arises from proof of ownership and control of premises, an automobile, or other property that the owner is in control and possession of contraband found therein.” Elrod v. State, 128 Ga. App. 250, 251 (1) (196 SE2d 360) (1973). "The rooms rented to others became the habitation of those to whom they were rented.” Huff v. State, 113 Ga. App. 257, 260 (147 SE2d 840) (1966).

2. The complaint that testimony by the defendant that he had never smoked a cigarette or taken a drink of liquor was disallowed is not well-founded. That same testimony had previously been admitted without objection. No reversible error appears in these circumstances. Tripcony v. Pickett, 132 Ga. App. 563 (1) (208 SE2d 574) (1974).

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*31 Webb, Judge.

Joseph Hawkins was convicted of possessing more than one ounce of marijuana (Code Ann. §§ 79A-811 (j), 79A-9917), and he now enumerates as error the general grounds of the motion for new trial and the sustaining of an objection to his testimony that he had never smoked a cigarette nor taken a drink of liquor. We affirm.

1. The evidence reveals that Hawkins rented and controlled the room where the marijuana was found, thus authorizing a finding of constructive possession. "In the absence of any circumstances to the contrary, a presumption arises from proof of ownership and control of premises, an automobile, or other property that the owner is in control and possession of contraband found therein.” Elrod v. State, 128 Ga. App. 250, 251 (1) (196 SE2d 360) (1973). "The rooms rented to others became the habitation of those to whom they were rented.” Huff v. State, 113 Ga. App. 257, 260 (147 SE2d 840) (1966).

2. The complaint that testimony by the defendant that he had never smoked a cigarette or taken a drink of liquor was disallowed is not well-founded. That same testimony had previously been admitted without objection. No reversible error appears in these circumstances. Tripcony v. Pickett, 132 Ga. App. 563 (1) (208 SE2d 574) (1974).

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 S.E.2d 377, 141 Ga. App. 31, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-state-gactapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack