Hawkins v. State
This text of 157 S.E. 905 (Hawkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Special grounds 1, 2, and 3 of the motion for a new trial are not complete and understandable within themselves, and, therefore, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, can not be considered.
2. Special grounds 4 and 5 of the motion for a new trial, when considered in the light of the trial judge’s note attached to each of those grounds, show no error.
3. The verdict ivas amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 S.E. 905, 43 Ga. App. 101, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-state-gactapp-1931.