Hawkins v. State
86 S.E. 735, 17 Ga. App. 315, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 375
Opinion
1. Prima facie the term “recently” imports reference to a transaction in the immediate past. Consequently, proof that a store was recently burglarized must, in the absence of any further inquiry, or any other testimony upon that point, be held to refer to a point of time within four years, the period within which prosecutions for burglary must be instituted.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hawkins v. State, 86 S.E. 735, 17 Ga. App. 315, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 375 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).
86 S.E. 735 (Hawkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peters v. State
192 S.E. 84 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)