Hawkins v. State

18 S.W. 240, 55 Ark. 353, 1892 Ark. LEXIS 19
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 23, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 18 S.W. 240 (Hawkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawkins v. State, 18 S.W. 240, 55 Ark. 353, 1892 Ark. LEXIS 19 (Ark. 1892).

Opinion

Hemingway, J.

Under the statute which provides that every person who shall “ maliciously sever from the freehold any produce thereof or anything attached thereto shall upon conviction be adjudged guilty of a misdemeanor” (Mansf. Digest, sec. 1658), an indictment which charges that the defendants ” maliciously did sever from the freehold five watermelons, of the value of twenty-five cents each, of the property of Smith Madewells ” contains a sufficient allegation of ownership to describe and identify the offense and to sustain a judgment of conviction. The sufficiency of the indictment in this respect being the only matter urged for a reversal, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 S.W. 240, 55 Ark. 353, 1892 Ark. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-state-ark-1892.