Hawkins v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hawkins v. State

131 So. 919, 24 Ala. App. 645

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 13, 1931·No. 6 Div. 848.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The constitutionality of the statute under which this prosecution is brought has been upheld by this court. Hayes v. State, 23 Ala. App. 524, 128 So. 774.

Other questions raised, even if technical error, are not of sufficient moment to war-, rant a reversal. The issue was clear, and the defendant was permitted to make his defense and to introduce all testimony bearing on the issue offered by him. The issue was for the jury, and we find no prejudicial errors in any rulings of the court.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The constitutionality of the statute under which this prosecution is brought has been upheld by this court. Hayes v. State, 23 Ala. App. 524, 128 So. 774.

Other questions raised, even if technical error, are not of sufficient moment to war-, rant a reversal. The issue was clear, and the defendant was permitted to make his defense and to introduce all testimony bearing on the issue offered by him. The issue was for the jury, and we find no prejudicial errors in any rulings of the court.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Hawkins v. State, 131 So. 919, 24 Ala. App. 645 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

131 So. 919 (Hawkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related