Hawkins v. State

131 So. 919, 24 Ala. App. 645
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 13, 1931
Docket6 Div. 848.
StatusPublished

This text of 131 So. 919 (Hawkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawkins v. State, 131 So. 919, 24 Ala. App. 645 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The constitutionality of the statute under which this prosecution is brought has been upheld by this court. Hayes v. State, 23 Ala. App. 524, 128 So. 774.

Other questions raised, even if technical error, are not of sufficient moment to war-, rant a reversal. The issue was clear, and the defendant was permitted to make his defense and to introduce all testimony bearing on the issue offered by him. The issue was for the jury, and we find no prejudicial errors in any rulings of the court.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hayes v. State
128 So. 774 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 So. 919, 24 Ala. App. 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-state-alactapp-1931.