Hawkins v. Russi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hawkins v. Russi

193 A.D.2d 1032, 598 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5353

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 A.D.2d 1032 (Hawkins v. Russi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawkins v. Russi, 193 A.D.2d 1032, 598 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kane, J.), entered August 10, 1992 in Sullivan County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition as time barred.

The Statute of Limitations began to run on the Parole Board decision at issue on February 11, 1992, when petitioner admittedly received the parole appeal decision notice (see, Matter of Biondo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 60 NY2d [1033]*1033832). Given that the proceeding was commenced upon service of the order to show cause and petition on respondent in July 1992, after the four-month Statute of Limitations had expired (see, Matter of Bogle v Mann, 175 AD2d 409), Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition as time barred.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kane, J.), entered August 10, 1992 in Sullivan County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition as time barred.

The Statute of Limitations began to run on the Parole Board decision at issue on February 11, 1992, when petitioner admittedly received the parole appeal decision notice (see, Matter of Biondo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 60 NY2d [1033]*1033832). Given that the proceeding was commenced upon service of the order to show cause and petition on respondent in July 1992, after the four-month Statute of Limitations had expired (see, Matter of Bogle v Mann, 175 AD2d 409), Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition as time barred.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 1032, 598 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-russi-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack