Hawkins v. Pollard
Opinion
1 5 JEFF HAWKINS, Case No.: 21cv1328-JO-JLB Platt, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND Vv. RECOMMENDATION AND } MARCUS POLLARD, Warden; B.D. COMP AINE NEES PHILLIPS, Associate Warden; D. LEWIS, Associate Warden; GARCIA, Facility } Captain, Defendants. On July 23, 2021, Plaintiff Jeff Hawkins, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Warden Marcus Pollard Associate Wardens B.D. Phillips and D. Lewis, and Facility Captain Garcia (collectively )“Defendants”). In his complaint, Plaintiff alleged that Defendants violated his Eightl Amendment rights by failing to protect him from contracting COVID-19 while he wa: incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility. Dkt. 1 (“Complaint”) Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim. Dkt. 17 On September 7, 2022, Magistrate Judge Burkhardt issued a Report and Recommendatio1
(“Report”) recommending that the Complaint against Defendants be dismissed with leave to amend. Neither party filed objections to this Report. While the district court has the authority to “accept, reject, or modify” the recommendations made by the magistrate judge, it only does so when parties object to them. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). “The statute makes it clear that the district judge must review magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.” United States v. Reyna—Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (emphasis original). “Neither the Constitution nor the statute requires a district judge to review, de novo, findings and recommendations that the parties themselves accept as correct.” Jd. Neither party has filed objections to the Report. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Burkhardt’s Report [Dkt. 24] in its entirety. The Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED with leave to file an amended complaint on or before December 14, 2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. — ||Dated: kc | | [2 CC ( oy — Honorable Jinsook Ohta United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hawkins v. Pollard (Hawkins v. Pollard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.