Hawkins v. Nunnelly

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Hawkins v. Nunnelly

1 Ark. 149

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJuly 15, 1845

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Ark. 149 (Hawkins v. Nunnelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawkins v. Nunnelly, 1 Ark. 149 (Ark. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

Oldiiam, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a summary proceeding upon a forfeited delivery bond. The judgment was rendered by default, and the court assessed the damages, without awarding a writ of inquiry. This case comes within the rule laid down in Patton & Stewart vs. Wolcott, 4 Ark. 579, and Jennings vs. Ashley & Beebe, 5 Ark. 128, and is in violation of it, and must therefore be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oldiiam, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a summary proceeding upon a forfeited delivery bond. The judgment was rendered by default, and the court assessed the damages, without awarding a writ of inquiry. This case comes within the rule laid down in Patton & Stewart vs. Wolcott, 4 Ark. 579, and Jennings vs. Ashley & Beebe, 5 Ark. 128, and is in violation of it, and must therefore be reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ark. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-nunnelly-ark-1845.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack