Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hawkins v. McNeil

Hawkins v. McNeil

9 So. 3d 639, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1698, 2009 WL 508583
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 3, 2009
Docket1D09-0507
StatusPublished

This text of 9 So. 3d 639 (Hawkins v. McNeil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawkins v. McNeil, 9 So. 3d 639, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1698, 2009 WL 508583 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for all writs jurisdiction is denied because petitioner has an adequate legal remedy in the appeal now pending before this court in Hawkins v. McNeil, 1D09-0506.

DENIED.

BARFIELD, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 So. 3d 639, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1698, 2009 WL 508583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-mcneil-fladistctapp-2009.