Hawkins v. Lee

6 Ky. Op. 390, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 171
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJanuary 24, 1873
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Ky. Op. 390 (Hawkins v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hawkins v. Lee, 6 Ky. Op. 390, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 171 (Ky. Ct. App. 1873).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The testimony shows that no change was made and no compensation expected for the transportation of the package containing plaintiff’s money from Paducah to its destination on the Tennessee River.

As to such package the owners of the steamer were not acting in the capacity of common carriers, but as mere accommodation bailees. They are not liable for its loss unless it resulted from the neglect of themselves, their agents or their servants.

Whether or not it was so lost, was a question which the parties voluntarily submitted to the court for adjudication. The judgment of the court in a common law action stands on the same footing with the verdict of a jury. We are not prepared to decide that the judgment in this case was palpably against the weight of the evidence.

It must therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Ky. Op. 390, 1873 Ky. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-lee-kyctapp-1873.