Hawkins v. Lee
This text of 6 Ky. Op. 156 (Hawkins v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The testimony; shows that no. charge was made and no- compensation expected for the transportation of the package containing plaintiff’s money from Paducah' to its destination on the Tennessee river.
As to such package, the owners of the steamer were not acting in the capacity of common carriers, but as mere accommodation bailees. They are not liable for its lossi unless it resulted from the neglect of themselves, their agents or their servants.
Whether or not it was so lost, was a question which the parties voluntarily submitted to the court for adjudication. The judgment of the court in a common law action stands on the same footing with the verdict of a jury. We are not prepared to decide that the judgment in this case was palpably against the weight of the evidence.
It must therefore be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Ky. Op. 156, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-lee-kyctapp-1872.